Kye Simmons

Just another term I needed to Google..

For years I thought being called a “pick me” meant someone desperately chasing attention. Turns out, according to the internet, it’s a woman whose opinions aren’t approved by the committee.

Who knew? I guess the fascinating part isn’t so much the label itself. It’s how quickly people reach for labels when they can’t fit someone neatly into a category they don’t want to understand.

You see apparently if I support women, I’m supposed to think a certain way. If I disagree with a particular idea, I’m supposed to belong to a certain group. If I don’t follow the script, there must be something wrong with me.

A pick me.
A misogynist.
A feminist.
A conservative.
A progressive.

Humans seem to love filing people into little boxes because uncertainty is uncomfortable. I don’t roll like that..

But the irony of all of this..?

Many of the same people who champion self acceptance and individuality become deeply uncomfortable when someone expresses individuality in a way they didn’t expect.

I don’t need everyone to agree with me.
I don’t need everyone to like me.
And I certainly don’t need strangers on the internet assigning me an identity because they can’t make sense of my views.

You can call me a pick me if you like.
You can cal me whatever you want.
I’ll be over here picking my own opinions, firmly attached to healthy values and morals.

To tell me, what label have you been given that said more about the person using it than it did about you? 👇

So many questions.

If a boys’ school has the right to say, “Only boys can attend,” why is that controversial?

And if a boys’ school can define what a boy is, can a girls’ school define what a girl is?

A decade ago, these questions would have seemed absurd. Today, they are some of the most contested questions in education.

What interests me isn’t the outrage. It’s the contradiction. We’ve been told that biological s*x doesn’t matter.

Yet schools remain separated by s*x.
We’ve been told that gender identity is what matters. Yet some institutions are now drawing hard lines around biological reality.

So which is it?

Is a single s*x school defined by s*x or by identity?

Can all schools apply the same standard?
Or are different rules being applied depending on who is asking the question?

Whatever your position on this issue, one thing seems clear:

The conversation is changing.

Questions that were once shut down are now being asked in public. Questions that were once labelled hateful are now appearing in mainstream headlines.

So the real test isn’t whether we agree.

It’s whether we’re still allowed to ask the question.

What do you think?

The moment you understand customer acquisition; you will never look at the gender industry the same way again.

Once you see the sales funnel, you can't unsee it.

And then I read this story :

A mother of a gender distressed teenager decided to go undercover. She presented herself to a gender clinic as someone wanting to transition from female to male. According to her account, she progressed through the system via telehealth appointments and was eventually approved for testosterone, a double mastectomy, hysterectomy and phalloplasty.
The process reportedly took 231 days. The detail that caught her attention was a statement she says was repeated throughout the process: "We are not here to act as gatekeepers."
The cost?
Reportedly, surgery co payments were around $100 to $200, while testosterone cost approximately $5.

Read that again.

Then ask yourself what questions this story raises for you.

Now I get it - some might say she's a mature woman she should be able to get what she wants. But there are risks to all surgeries and drugs and I wonder how much of that information was communicated?
And since when did safeguarding children become a dirty word?
In every other field of medicine, treatment, assessment, clinicians are expected to ask difficult questions.

To challenge assumptions, to investigate underlying causes. To weigh up the risks against the benefits. To say "not yet" and "lets wait" until necessary.
Yet in this story the complete absence of gatekeeping was cheered and presented as a virtue.
Again, well intended people being manipulated.

The most profitable customer is the one who never stops being a customer. So when something is sold as care results in decades of appointments, prescriptions, procedures and medical dependence, surely scrutiny is warranted.

When clinicians are no longer gatekeepers, who exactly is protecting the child? What do you think is really happening here?

Quick question?

How many courses have you bought that are still collecting digital dust?

How many coaches, certifications, templates, gatherings, journal prompts or strategies have promised the answer?

Yet somehow you're still standing in the same place.

Most people spend their lives chasing the HAVE.
When I HAVE more time, more money, more confidence.

Some focus on the DO.
What are the actions, the habits the strategies they need to implement

Very few focus who they need to BE.
And maybe that's because becoming the person who naturally creates the life you want is far less s*xy than buying another course or attending another retreat. But you don't need to journal more, you don't need to meditate less, you need to BE the person you were placed on this earth to BE. And that means breaking the rules that were never yours in the first place.

BE. DO. HAVE. Be the Anarchist isn't another motivational book. it's not mindset work. Its your permission to be the Anarchist in your life. A step by step framework to identify the beliefs, stories and invisible limitations keeping you stuck, then how to break them.
I'm sure you have heard this before;
You don't get what you want.
You get what your identity allows.

You want more money? You won't if you keep telling yourself another course will fix the problem.

Stop spending thousands looking for the missing strategy.
It's not missing, because it's YOU

It's time to stop collecting information and start being the rule breaker your life deserves.

Comment BE and I'll send you the details.

Most women would die for their children.
They would sacrifice everything to protect them. To ensure they had the same opportunities as other children.

Yet somehow we're expected to applaud while young girls are pushed aside in their own sporting spaces??

I have said this before and will continue to speak to this -
A boy entering female sport isn't inclusion.

It's displacement of women.
A boy entering female spaces isn't progress. It's entitlement.

And therefore it begs the questions:
What drives someone to demand access to spaces that were never created for them?

I struggle to see compassion.
I see narcissism. I see misogyny.
I see a belief that women's boundaries, opportunities and achievements matter less than male feelings.

And what's even harder to understand is the number of women supporting this.

Women who would fight to the death for their daughters, yet cheer while female sport, female spaces and female protections are dismantled.

This isn't equality.
It is the erasure of women.
And history will judge every person who stood by and called it progress.

What do you think the identity of Australia is?
Not our flag. Not our History.
Who are we, really?

I sat with this for a while before deciding whether to post it.

I am acutely aware of the fine line I walk on this platform, and the extent to which information is used to shape public opinion and manipulate beliefs.

I want to be absolutely clear:
I do not oppose immigration.

What I oppose is the rapid intake of thousands of people every day when serious questions remain about screening, integration, public safety, and whether those arriving share the values that underpin Australian society.

One of those values is respect for women.
That is why stories like this matter.

Imagine if this were your child, your children, your daughter or sister.
Imagine getting that phone call.

If that doesn't make your blood boil or leave you shaking your head, then we probably see the world very differently.

Protecting women and girls should never be controversial.

I remember travelling to Tasmania as part of a girls sporting team. At the time there were strict rules around teenage girls sharing hotel rooms and safeguarding policies were taken very seriously.

Fast forward to today and I'm looking at government funding allocated to programs such as inclusive practice training, LGBTQIA+ leadership initiatives and a Rainbow Kids Playgroup.

Genuine question:

At what point do we stop and ask whether taxpayer funded programs are addressing genuine community needs, or promoting a particular ideology?

So what is going on here?
This is a record of allocated funds to ideological programs for the 2025-26 financial year for Burnie, in Tasmania.
FOR ONE SUBURB.. ONE

CUrious what the rest of the country looks like.. I was and this is what I found:
➡️Western Australia announced a $2.25 million package including a new LGBTIQA+ Inclusion Initiatives Grants Program.
➡️Victoria has committed more than $25 million to the Pride Centre, $15 million through previous LGBTIQ+ budget commitments, and continues to fund dedicated grants, festivals, organisational development and sector strengthening programs.
➡️NSW is a little more tricky to establish as it funds many grants through different services but its estimated to be around the $20 Million mark.

This screams of rainbow washing and indoctrination.
Imagine where that money could be better distributed for your local community or school in Burnie Tasmania.

I can't help but wonder what local parents, schools, sporting clubs, mental health services, youth programs or community groups in Tasmania could have done with the same funding.

Every dollar spent is a dollar not spent somewhere else.

What would you prioritise for your local community?

I’m quite a pragmatic person.
Never one to dwell on a problem, always looking for a logical solution and the fastest way to get there for the win.

But I’m tired of watching common sense get shouted down by ideology.

You don’t need a degree, a government department, or a panel of experts to tell you what you can clearly see.

Think critically.
Question everything.
Stop surrendering your judgement to people who profit from your confusion.

The silent majority isn’t asleep

Their patience is running out.�Their voice is getting louder.�If you’re walking this with me, share this wide and far.�Start conversations.

Let’s being common sense back.

For most of my adult life I called my independence a strength.

Until I realised it had quietly become armour.

When we met I was deep in my masculine. Single parent. Program director. Leading a large team. Making every decision, holding every thread, carrying every weight. Alone.
And I was good at it. I just didn't know what it was costing me.
He would hold doors open. Walk on the outside of the footpath. Place me between him and the building. Choose the restaurant. Pay the bill.

Annnnd I would spiral.

Is this love bombing? Am I dating a narcissist?

What I realised, slowly, uncomfortably, was that my independence had become an armour so thick that receiving felt unsafe. Not because he was doing anything wrong. Because I had forgotten how to let someone in. How to trust. To allow myself to soften.

Energy is both masculine and feminine. Life requires both. Leadership requires both. Love requires both.
But spend too long in the opposite of your nature and it stops feeling like strength. It becomes incongruence. Burnout. The inability to surrender, receive, or truly let anyone in.

Somehow we invested hard into the idea that softness was weakness. That we could do all that men do. That needing someone was a failure. And women internalised it, especially mothers. And very mich today in young women..

We override our partners because we tell ourselves only we know best. We even gaslight ourselves with our own maternal instinct.
Do-the-thing 3 times because some woman on the internet said I'd be a bad parent if I didnt...

You've been there!! I know you have. We all have..

So here's your permission to try different. If you get a defeated 'yes dear' often this could be quite the hill for you but if you have a loving partner - let them lead. And you..
Schedule the non-masculine day. Get the massage. Wear the dress. Going out for dinner, let him choose. Let him pay. Let him open the door without making it an issue.

Not because you can't.
But because you've earned the right to receive this safety.
Soften without shame.
That is the most radical thing a high achieving woman can do.

Tag the man who makes you feel safe. 🖤