Texas National Security Review

Texas National Security Review

Share

Launched in 2017 by The University of Texas System, the Texas National Security Review is a journal committed to excellence, scholarly rigor, and big ideas.

We are also the home of the "Horns of a Dilemma" podcast. An inter-disciplinary, policy-relevant journal on national and international security affairs, brought to you by The University of Texas at Austin.

06/03/2026

Following recent talks in Beijing, Washington and Beijing have pledged to build a relationship based on "strategic stability." It is a vital diplomatic formulation. But does the political rhetoric match the academic reality?

In our newly released Volume 9, Issue 2, we present a roundtable on the true nature of strategic stability today. As the contributing authors argue, achieving stability is more elusive now than during the Cold War. The contributors dive deep into the widening gap between political promises and the complex realities of artificial intelligence, cyber operations, psychology, and precision-strike weapons.

05/29/2026

How do cyber operations actually impact nuclear stability?

In our new episode, Dr. Jackie Schneider breaks down the complex relationship between digital networks and nuclear weapons. She argues that the most dangerous cyber operations are those that attack our relationship with data and undermine our trust in decision-making systems. Furthermore, she posits that centralizing networks for nuclear control might increase efficiency, but it ultimately sacrifices resilience.

05/27/2026

Do cyber operations fundamentally undermine nuclear stability? On our newest episode of the Horns of a Dilemma podcast, we welcome Dr. Jackie Schneider to unpack her recent article, "Cyber Operations and Nuclear Stability: Networked Instability."

Schneider argues that our common understanding of cyber and nuclear risks is often misguided by pop-culture fears. Instead, she explores how network structures—balancing centralization, efficiency, and vulnerability—truly dictate escalation risks. Interestingly, she posits that cyber capabilities might actually increase a state's dangerous certainty, making deliberate escalation the most prominent threat.

Listen to the full episode to hear her insights on artificial intelligence, sensor entanglement, and the future of nuclear command and control.

Hoover Institution

05/15/2026

We pulled a compelling moment from our latest episode of "Horns of a Dilemma." Listen as Michael C. Horowitz challenges the prevailing narrative around military technology.

Horowitz argues that when it comes to adopting artificial intelligence, the U.S. military is moving too slowly, not too quickly. He contends that public fears over experimental prototypes misinterpret how the innovation system works. For proven AI applications, he argues the Pentagon has been slow to scale and must "hit the accelerator."

University of Pennsylvania | Perry World House

Photos from University of Texas Press's post 05/15/2026
05/13/2026

In our latest episode of "Horns of a Dilemma," Michael C. Horowitz discusses his TNSR piece, "Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Strategic Stability."

Horowitz argues that the debate around AI and nuclear risk is not a simple linear story. He contends that early integration of AI into nuclear command and control could be destabilizing. However, as militaries calibrate their understanding of what algorithms can and cannot do, the technology may eventually become stabilizing. Furthermore, Horowitz argues that psychology and organizational behavior are critical factors in shaping these outcomes over time.

Join us as we explore the balance of power, automation bias, and the future of military systems.



University of Pennsylvania | Perry World House

05/04/2026

Most people assume they understand the systems they use every day. But as Rose McDermott (The Watson School of International and Public Affairs at Brown University) explains, confidence is often misplaced.

Using a system is not the same as understanding it. This gap becomes especially important in national security, where policymakers must make decisions about technologies like AI, hypersonic weapons, and WMDs. When leaders rely on surface-level familiarity, they tend to underestimate how complex these systems are—and how long it takes to develop and deploy them effectively. The result is flawed planning and unrealistic expectations. McDermott’s argument is a reminder that real understanding requires deeper engagement with how systems actually work—not just how they are used.

Listen to the full conversation:
https://tnsr.org/2026/04/psychological-biases-in-the-era-of-nuclear-weapons-and-ai/

05/01/2026

What is the true cost of overestimating technological capabilities?

In this video clip from our podcast, Cameron Tracy discusses the Reagan administration's Strategic Defense Initiative. He explains how the billions spent on unrealized directed energy systems created a massive opportunity cost.

Tracy argues that every dollar spent on a weapon that never materializes is a dollar not spent on reliable, near-term solutions. As we see renewed interest in these same concepts four decades later, he challenges defense planners to learn from past overestimations.

Watch the clip and read the full article:https://tnsr.org/2026/04/beyond-the-hype-the-reality-of-precision-strike-weapons-in-ukraine



UC Berkeley's Goldman School of Public Policy

04/29/2026

Are we predicting the future of warfare all wrong? On our latest episode of "Horns of a Dilemma," Cameron Tracy breaks down his recent article analyzing the tactical and discursive effects of new precision-strike weapons in the Russo-Ukrainian War.

He argues that analysts are frequently drawn to unrepresentative extremes, mistakenly expecting military revolutions around every corner. Instead, Tracy demonstrates how weapons like glide bombs and hypersonic missiles rapidly undergo a process of "normalization" once deployed. Ultimately, he concludes that adapting to technological surprise is often far more vital than attempting to anticipate it.

Read the article and listen to our full discussion here:
https://tnsr.org/2026/04/beyond-the-hype-the-reality-of-precision-strike-weapons-in-ukraine



UC Berkeley's Goldman School of Public Policy

04/20/2026

Why did Putin think the war in Ukraine would be over in three days?

In this clip, Rose McDermott (The Watson School of International and Public Affairs at Brown University) breaks down the psychological and structural flaws of personalist regimes. When loyalty is valued more than competence, leaders are often insulated from reality by the very people meant to advise them.

Want your school to be the top-listed School/college in Austin?

Click here to claim your Sponsored Listing.

Location

Category

Address

Austin, TX