06/03/2026
Following recent talks in Beijing, Washington and Beijing have pledged to build a relationship based on "strategic stability." It is a vital diplomatic formulation. But does the political rhetoric match the academic reality?
In our newly released Volume 9, Issue 2, we present a roundtable on the true nature of strategic stability today. As the contributing authors argue, achieving stability is more elusive now than during the Cold War. The contributors dive deep into the widening gap between political promises and the complex realities of artificial intelligence, cyber operations, psychology, and precision-strike weapons.
05/27/2026
Do cyber operations fundamentally undermine nuclear stability? On our newest episode of the Horns of a Dilemma podcast, we welcome Dr. Jackie Schneider to unpack her recent article, "Cyber Operations and Nuclear Stability: Networked Instability."
Schneider argues that our common understanding of cyber and nuclear risks is often misguided by pop-culture fears. Instead, she explores how network structures—balancing centralization, efficiency, and vulnerability—truly dictate escalation risks. Interestingly, she posits that cyber capabilities might actually increase a state's dangerous certainty, making deliberate escalation the most prominent threat.
Listen to the full episode to hear her insights on artificial intelligence, sensor entanglement, and the future of nuclear command and control.
Hoover Institution
05/13/2026
In our latest episode of "Horns of a Dilemma," Michael C. Horowitz discusses his TNSR piece, "Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Strategic Stability."
Horowitz argues that the debate around AI and nuclear risk is not a simple linear story. He contends that early integration of AI into nuclear command and control could be destabilizing. However, as militaries calibrate their understanding of what algorithms can and cannot do, the technology may eventually become stabilizing. Furthermore, Horowitz argues that psychology and organizational behavior are critical factors in shaping these outcomes over time.
Join us as we explore the balance of power, automation bias, and the future of military systems.
University of Pennsylvania | Perry World House
04/29/2026
Are we predicting the future of warfare all wrong? On our latest episode of "Horns of a Dilemma," Cameron Tracy breaks down his recent article analyzing the tactical and discursive effects of new precision-strike weapons in the Russo-Ukrainian War.
He argues that analysts are frequently drawn to unrepresentative extremes, mistakenly expecting military revolutions around every corner. Instead, Tracy demonstrates how weapons like glide bombs and hypersonic missiles rapidly undergo a process of "normalization" once deployed. Ultimately, he concludes that adapting to technological surprise is often far more vital than attempting to anticipate it.
Read the article and listen to our full discussion here:
https://tnsr.org/2026/04/beyond-the-hype-the-reality-of-precision-strike-weapons-in-ukraine
UC Berkeley's Goldman School of Public Policy