Education Strategy Africa

My Usual Advice to Those Interested in Keeping Improved Kienyeji Chickens for Meat Production

✅ Buy chicks from a trusted source and ensure they are true F1 generation birds.

✅ Provide quality feeds consistently. There are no shortcuts in poultry farming.

✅ Feed according to age:

Starter crumbs: 0–4 weeks

Chick mash: 4–8 weeks

Growers mash: 8 weeks until market age

✅ Use a good multivitamin to support growth and reduce stress.

✅ Follow a complete vaccination schedule without skipping any vaccines.

✅ Ensure clean drinking water is available at all times.

✅ Provide proper housing with enough space and good ventilation.

✅ Protect the birds from predators, mosquitoes, and wild birds.

✅ Maintain high standards of cleanliness and follow a regular cleaning and disinfection program.

✅ Observe your birds daily. Early detection of problems saves losses.

✅ And above all, pray. Good management is important, but God's blessings matter too. 🙏

Remember, improved kienyeji chickens can give good returns, but success comes from proper management and consistency—not shortcuts.

Farm with Abel

—The village investor

Happy Father's day

Lessons Taught by Life:

The Reckless Become Stories Told by Others

The reckless mistake courage for haste and confidence for invincibility. In time, they become stories used to warn the next generation. The wise understand that every step deserves thought, because one careless decision can become a permanent chapter in another person's lesson.

Scars are philosophy written on the body. They remind us that suffering is not the opposite of life; it is one of its most faithful teachers. A person who has never fallen often mistakes luck for wisdom.

The lone wild dog continues to walk, not because the road is kind, but because movement itself is an act of hope. That is the greatest lesson of existence: life does not ask whether we have been wounded. It asks only whether we will continue walking.

The 10 Things Boards Take Casually That Carry Significant Governance Weight

Not every governance failure begins with fraud or scandal.

Many begin with something that felt too small to matter.

Over time, these habits shape the quality of oversight and the resilience of the organization.

Ten things boards often take casually that deserve far greater attention.
1. Informal decisions outside the boardroom.
This is the most dangerous habit because it bypasses the entire legal framework of governance. It strips away collective accountability and creates immediate personal liability for directors if a casual decision causes corporate harm.

2. Treating minutes as an administrative exercise.
Minutes are the official legal shield of the board. If regulatory scrutiny or litigation hits, courts do not look at what was said, they look at what was minuted. Treating this casually means erasing your evidence of proper due diligence.

3. Ignoring conflicts of interest because "everyone already knows."
Legally, "common knowledge" is not a defense. An undeclared conflict (even a well-known one) can completely invalidate a board vote, void a contract, and expose the board to devastating lawsuits for breaching the Duty of Loyalty.

4. Confusing trust with oversight.
This is the psychological root of most governance failures. Fiduciary duty requires an attitude of constructive skepticism.

5. Accepting poor quality board papers.
A board is entirely dependent on the quality of information it receives. If papers are late, overly dense or missing key data, the board is effectively making multi-million-dollar decisions in the dark.

6. Directors contacting staff directly.
This completely destroys the organizational structure. When individual directors bypass the CEO to give "suggestions" to staff, they create confusion, erode executive authority and cross the line from governance into management.

7. Reading board papers during the meeting.
A director who opens the board pack for the first time at the table cannot possibly exercise independent judgment or offer rigorous challenge.

8. Declaring, "No questions from me."
If an entire board has no questions on a complex management proposal, it suggests a lack of deep engagement or a fear of rock the boat.

9. Deferring difficult conversations.
Bad news does not age well. Postponing a tough conversation about executive performance, a failing strategy, or a compliance red flag usually means the board is forced to manage a full-blown crisis later, rather than resolving an issue early.

10. Starting meetings late.

The small habits around your board table today often determine the quality of the decisions your organization lives with tomorrow.

The top three represent immediate, catastrophic legal and compliance failure.

Send a message to learn more

Constructive skepticism is the attitude of questioning assumptions, claims, decisions, and information in a thoughtful and evidence-based way, with the goal of improving understanding and outcomes rather than criticizing or opposing for its own sake.

It combines two elements:

Skepticism – Not accepting information at face value. Asking:
Is this true?
What evidence supports it?
What assumptions are we making?
What risks are we overlooking?
Constructiveness – Seeking solutions and improvement. Asking:
How can we make this better?
What additional information do we need?
What alternatives should we consider?
How can we reduce the risks?
Example in Leadership

A school director proposes a new marketing campaign.

Negative skepticism: "This won't work. We tried something similar before."
Blind acceptance: "Sounds good. Let's do it."
Constructive skepticism: "This looks promising. What evidence do we have that it will attract our target parents? How will we measure success? Are there lower-cost alternatives we should test first?"
Example in Strategic Leadership

When reviewing a proposal, a constructive skeptic might say:

"I support the objective. Before we commit resources, let's examine the assumptions behind the projected enrolment growth and identify potential risks."

This approach demonstrates support for the mission while ensuring decisions are robust.

Characteristics of Constructive Skepticism
Curious rather than cynical
Evidence-based rather than opinion-based
Open-minded rather than closed-minded
Solution-focused rather than fault-finding
Respectful rather than confrontational
Seeks clarity rather than conflict
Why It Matters

For senior leaders, constructive skepticism:

Improves decision quality.
Reduces costly mistakes.
Encourages critical thinking.
Prevents groupthink.
Strengthens strategic planning.
Builds credibility because decisions are based on evidence, not assumptions.
A Practical Leadership Formula

Support the goal → Question the assumptions → Seek evidence → Suggest improvements → Commit to the decision.

For example:

"I fully support increasing student enrolment. Before we proceed, can we test the assumption that county-government employees are our primary untapped market? What data do we have, and what low-cost pilot could validate the opportunity?"

This is constructive skepticism in action: challenging the idea without challenging the person.

Send a message to learn more

You miss 100% of the shots you don't take!